The Canine Teeth-Normal Functional Relation of the Natural Teeth of Man. Journal of Southern California Dental Association, Feb 1958, Vol.26, No.2, pp.49-60.

In this earlier volume of his seminal series, Dr. Angelo D’Amico lays the groundwork for his exploration of the canine teeth and their critical role in occlusion. Published in Volume 26, No. 2 of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, this article introduces key anatomical, functional, and histologic observations that shape the concept of canine guidance. D’Amico emphasizes that the canine teeth are not only central to mandibular function but also act as biologic regulators of jaw movement and protectors of the dental system. This installment presents his early research and clinical rationale for why canine morphology and position must be preserved or restored in prosthetic and restorative dentistry.

Evolutionary and Functional Significance of Canines

Dr. D’Amico begins with a discussion of the evolutionary development of the canine teeth, noting their historical role in guidance, defense, and function. He describes how the human canine has evolved from a tearing instrument to a crucial component of guidance and disclusion in the modern dentition. Despite this change in function, their structural prominence remains—long roots, prominent crowns, and robust ligament support—suggesting their retained importance in biomechanical protection.

He argues that the evolutionary trajectory of the canines supports their role as a primary functional component in the dental arch, particularly in guiding the mandible during lateral movement.

Anatomical Advantages of the Canines

Canine teeth, D’Amico observes, possess the longest roots and greatest crown height among all the teeth, as well as the thickest cortical bone in their surrounding alveolus. These features make them uniquely suited to withstand the lateral pressures encountered during functional and parafunctional jaw movements.

Their mid-arch location places them in the ideal position to absorb and guide lateral forces during excursions. The canines’ proprioceptive feedback also helps in limiting excessive muscular activity by creating early sensory input during movement, allowing the jaw to redirect smoothly.

Occlusal Wear Patterns and Canine Function

One of the article’s most compelling points is the relationship between wear patterns and functional loading. D’Amico presents photographic and clinical documentation of patients with intact canines and well-preserved anterior guidance. These patients consistently show minimal posterior wear, stable joints, and reduced symptoms of parafunction.

In contrast, patients with worn, missing, or flattened canines often present with excessive posterior wear, TMJ discomfort, and generalized occlusal instability. This correlation supports his theory that canines serve as biomechanical “shock absorbers” and steering guides for the mandible.

Histological Evidence Supporting Guidance

D’Amico includes histological sections showing the impact of occlusal loading on periodontal ligament fibers and bone structure. In specimens with functioning canine guidance, the bone and ligament tissues appear organized and undamaged, even after decades of use. In contrast, areas subjected to lateral stress without canine protection exhibit microfractures, ligament damage, and alveolar bone resorption.

This evidence reinforces the biologic importance of canine protection. It’s not simply a theoretical construct—it has clear physiologic consequences when disrupted.

Clinical Implications and Restorative Philosophy

From a restorative standpoint, D’Amico urges dentists to preserve the canines whenever possible. In cases of full-mouth rehabilitation or prosthetic reconstruction, reestablishing canine function should be a priority. He warns that failure to restore proper guidance—especially in edentulous or heavily restored patients—leads to increased restorative failures, TMJ dysfunction, and long-term dissatisfaction.

His recommendation is to design occlusions that replicate the natural incline of the canines and provide smooth disclusion pathways during lateral excursions. This design serves both esthetic and functional needs while aligning with the body’s natural protective system.

Key Clinical Takeaways

  • Canine teeth have evolved to become the primary regulators of mandibular movement in modern dentition.
  • Their anatomy—long roots, prominent crowns, and bone support—makes them ideal for absorbing lateral forces.
  • Preserved canine guidance correlates with decreased posterior wear, stable joints, and improved muscle health.
  • Histological studies show that canine guidance protects periodontal and bone structures under function.
  • Restorative designs should prioritize the maintenance or re-establishment of canine-protected occlusion.
  • Neglecting canine function in prosthetic work increases the risk of system-wide breakdown.

This early contribution by Dr. D’Amico laid the essential foundation for modern functional occlusion concepts. His detailed observations and biologic evidence continue to influence restorative dentistry, prosthodontics, and interdisciplinary occlusal planning today.

Read the full article here.

Sign In

Register

Reset Password

Please enter your username or email address, you will receive a link to create a new password via email.